Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Abdelhamid, T S and Everett, J G (2002) Physiological Demands during Construction Work. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 427–37.

Bernold, L E (2002) Spatial Integration in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 400–8.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Surveys; Construction; Computer applications; Information; Global positioning; construction industry; Global Positioning System; laser beam applications; equipment evaluation; surveying; civil engineering;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(400)
  • Abstract:
    Work in construction always requires moving within, and interacting with, a complex environment while handling heavy materials and building elements to be joined, inserted, or aligned. Modern design software is able to digitally model all of those elements in their spatially correct configuration, and without interference. When it comes to the actual construction, however, the spatial models do not find any use. Twenty years after the manufacturing industry began using electronic design data to control their machinery, construction is also getting ready to move away from its longstanding tradition of working with paper-based blueprints. The newest steps on the path toward the use of three-dimensional digital design data in support of site operation are stimulated by the global positioning system and the many uses of lasers. Surveying has always performed critical functions on construction sites, such as marking building layouts, anchor bolts, concrete formwork, or bridge bearings. The objective of spatial integration in construction is to digitally merge spatial design data with the digital model of equipment working on implementing the design. This paper will briefly review historical advancements in “perfecting” the surveying technology before presenting three examples of a quantum leap in the way we design, plan, and control construction projects in the future.

Cheung, S, Suen, H C H and Lam, T (2002) Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 409–17.

Jonasson, S, Dunston, P S, Ahmed, K and Hamilton, J (2002) Factors in Productivity and Unit Cost for Advanced Machine Guidance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 367–74.

Karumanasseri, G and AbouRizk, S (2002) Decision Support System for Scheduling Steel Fabrication Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 392–9.

Kululanga, G K, Price, A D F and McCaffer, R (2002) Empirical Investigation of Construction Contractors' Organizational Learning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 385–91.

Ling, Y Y (2002) Model for Predicting Performance of Architects and Engineers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 446–55.

Lu, M (2002) Enhancing Project Evaluation and Review Technique Simulation through Artificial Neural Network-based Input Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 438–45.

Mawdesley, M J, Al-jibouri, S H and Yang, H (2002) Genetic Algorithms for Construction Site Layout in Project Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 418–26.

Mohamed, S (2002) Safety Climate in Construction Site Environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 375–84.

Skitmore, M and Ng, S T (2002) Analytical and Approximate Variance of Total Project Cost. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(05), 456–60.